Arcuri v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Plaintiff sued as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy. The defendant company pleaded that the policy never went into effect. The trial court found for the plaintiff. The facts in so far as they relate to this policy are that Antonio Ferraro, the deceased, applied. on December 7, 1928, for the policy in suit. He paid the first premium and agreed as follows: “ I further agree that the policy herein applied for shall be accepted subject to the privileges and provisions therein contained and that unless the full first premium is paid by me at the time of making this application, the policy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hart v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Hart v. Travelers Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Corning v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Buono v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gaunt v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Powell v. Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Gaunt v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947