Legal Opinion

Rhinelander Real Estate Co. v. Cammeyer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

This action was brought to recover from defendants on a guarantee of rents made under the following circumstances:

The defendants'were either jointly of consecutively lessees of a building, owned by the plaintiff, for a term ending February 1, 1919. Defendants sublet to a company which I shall call the Moritz Company one of. the floors of the building for a term ending February 1, 1919 (simultaneously with the main lease) *69and! covenanted to supply the Moritz Company with steam in a certain amount and at a certain pressure. On December 11, 1917, the defendants surrendered their lease to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norman v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Eten v. . LuysterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Miller v. . ClaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De WaltoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Schoellkopf v. . CoatsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Precision Dynamics Corp. v. Retailers Representatives, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  2. Da Costa's Automotive, Inc. v. Birchwood Plaza Shell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Rhinelander Real Estate Co. v. CammeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Gibbs Oil Co. v. ElowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  5. In re Monetary GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API