Hardwicke-Etter Co. v. City of Durant
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Bryan County; Geo. C. Crump, Assigned Judge. Mandamus by Hardwicke-Etter Company and others against the City of Durant. Judgment against certain plaintiffs, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action commenced by several judgment creditors of the city of Durant for the purpose of securing the issuance of a writ of mandamus against the city officials directing them to pay off and satisfy each of the judgments described in che petition, provision for the payment of such judgments having been previously made in the manner provided by law.
Upon trial to the court, part of the judgments involved were held to be valid and relief was granted as prayed for, and the balance were held to be invalid and relief was denied. The judgment debtors thus ruled against, being dissatisfied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisville Bridge Co. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Brice v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- McDonald v. TisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Claflin & Kimball v. Mather Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- J. F. Hall-Martin Co. v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Vane v. C. Hoffberger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Lake v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Thompson v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982