Gray v. Hall
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
PRESTON, J., Dissenting.
I am unable to concur in the conclusion in this ease. I heartily concur, however, in so much of the opinion as holds the answer on file to be a sufficient traverse of the allegations of the complaint.
The net result of the situation then is that a defendant who has fully answered the plaintiff’s complaint has, without a hearing or a chance to be heard, had his property taken from him by ex parte action of the court. The question may again be stated as follows: Is due process of law satisfied where a defendant has appeared and set up a complete defense to the cause of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.