Legal Opinion

Dabrowski v. Dabrowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Inasmuch as the parties elected to depart from the issues as made by the pleadings and to try other issues relating to the merits of the controversy, including the counterclaim, we feel that the Referee should have granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the proof (Viennese Melody v. Majestic Refrigerator Corp., 279 App. Div. 243), and should also have dismissed the counterclaim. In our opinion, the evidence establishes that the down payment made upon the purchase price of the premises in suit consisted solely of funds derived by the defendant from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Viennese Melody, Inc. v. Majestic Refrigerator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API