Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knupp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1985No. 882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

Appellant, Timothy Knupp, takes this appeal from his conviction on two charges of retail theft. In this appeal, appellant raises three issues: (1) whether appellant was denied his rights under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100, (2) whether appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel in *307asserting his rights under Rule 1100, and (3) whether the lower court erred in permitting appellant’s prior, uncounseled retail theft offenses to be considered for purposes of sentence enhancement. Because we find the Commonwealth’s petition to extend to be untimely, we find appellant’s first issue to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. CrowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. CareySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. IancovettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhetstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. KnuppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. Atkison, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1986
  5. Commonwealth v. Bator, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API