Legal Opinion
HOBBY LOBBY v. ROBERTS
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 2015No. 113,371PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH, Judge.
11 Petitioners, Hobby Lobby (Employer) and its workers' compensation insurance carrier, Twin City Fire Insurance (Insurer), seek review of a Workers Compensation Court of Existing Claims panel decision affirming as modified a trial court decision that found Petitioners violated the privacy rights of Claimant, Neil Roberts. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate that part of the panel's decision for which review is sought, and remand with instructions to comply with the procedural requirements of Workers Compensation Court Rule 64. Insurer's motion for oral…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- King Manufacturing v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Northwest Datsun v. Oklahoma Motor Vehicle CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- HOBBY LOBBY v. ROBERTSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015