Legal Opinion

In re Kristie Edna Bumstead

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 9, 2025No. 3:24-cv-05341Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT TACOMA 9 In re: CASE NO. 24-CV-5341-BHS 10 Kristie Edna Bumstead, U.S.B.C. NO. 24-40245 11 Debtor. ORDER 12 LPL Financial LLC, 13 Appellant, 14 v. 15 Kristie Edna Bumstead, 16 Appellee. 17 18 This MATTER is before the Court on Appellant LPL Financial LLC’s appeal, 19 Dkt. 10, of the bankruptcy court’s Order, Dkt. 1 at 12, ruling that LPL does not have a 20 security interest in post-bankruptcy petition payments owed to debtor Kristie Bumstead. 21 22 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 Matthew Bumstead is Kristie Bumstead’s spouse.1…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Banks v. Gill Distribution Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Arkison v. Frontier Asset Management, LLC (In Re Skagit Pacific Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Burman v. Homan (In Re Homan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. In re: Michael W. Endresen and Joanne Maureen EndresenUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API