Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Oakville Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1967No. C.D. 3052Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Richardson, Judge:

While I am in complete agreement with my colleague I deem it here appropriate to comment on my reason for remanding the matter for separate appraisements of the dutiable items of merchandise insofar as one branch of the case is concerned, in the wake of a recent development in a reappraisement case where as a single judge I took the position we are here taking in directing a remand, but was reversed on application to review. (See John V. Carr & Son, v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 513, Reap. Dec. 10902, reversed and remanded, United States v. John V. Carr &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Sewing Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Consolidated Sewing Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Parrot v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API