Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yardley v. Swapp

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1961No. 9379Published

1DissentCallister, Justice

I agree with the majority opinion that it would be desirable to have a declaration of the water rights of these litigants. However, the plaintiff, having commenced this action, had the burden of introducing evidence which would establish a water right in himself, its priority, nature, quantity and .extent thereof; also, the rights and priorities of the defendants and that the defendants have deprived him of water to which he is entitled. This the plaintiff failed to do.

As I read the majority opinion, it would have the effect of placing upon the defendants the burden of proving the existence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lost Creek Irrigation Co. v. RexUtah Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API