Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Hasse

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1920No. 6255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The first question in the brief for appellant relates to the alleged error of the trial court in permitting the plaintiff while on the stand as a witness for himself to be asked and to answer, over the objection of defendant, the following question:

“Please state whether or not these cattle were in such condition to stand the trip, if they had been handled in the usual and ordinary manner, and had -reached their destination in reasonable time, in a car that was bedded in tHe usual way.”

The answer to the question was: “I think they would have stood the trip all right.”

In substance, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Stark Grain Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Texas Central Railroad v. Hannay-Frerichs & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Rio Grande, E. P. & S. F. R. v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BufkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Baker v. Nance Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Billberry v. Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. EdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API