Legal Opinion

Lindley v. Bradshaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1914No. 2600PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, First District; Son. J. D. Call, Judge. Action by William Lindley against James Bradshaw. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for a failure to keep in repair a partition fence. The right of action is based on Comp. Laws 1907, section 73. A trial to a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. The defendant has interposed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the same for the reason that the notice of appeal was not served and filed within six months from the entry of judgment, the time required by Comp. Laws 1907, section 3301.

The record discloses that the verdict of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lorntzen v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API