Legal Opinion
No.
Colorado Attorney General Reports
Decided September 1, 1988Published
1Opinion of the Court
Timothy W. Schultz Executive Director Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 518 Denver, CO 80203
Dear Mr. Schultz:
This letter is in reply to your request for an Attorney General's opinion on who can legally represent taxpayers in proceedings before the Board of Assessment Appeals (hereinafter, "the Board").
QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION
Your request for an Attorney General's opinion presents two questions:
1. Can a nonattorney represent an individual taxpayer before the Board pursuant to section 39-2-127(4), C.R.S. (1982), as amended by 1988 H.B. 1044?
No.
2. Can a nonattorney…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. 9.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Marquette County, Michigan, Beico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Dolan v. RustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Denver Bar Association v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Walacavage v. Excell 2000, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.