Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 9, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-32-NNPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

MacKENZIE, Chief Judge.

Defendant Colonial Williamsburg Foundation has moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for partial summary judgment in the instant action. Plaintiff Frazier brought this suit against Colonial Williamsburg, claiming that he was wrongfully discharged. Frazier’s complaint has three counts: first, that the discharge violated the provisions of Title VII; second, that Colonial Williams-burg's ' actions deprived Frazier of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and third, that Colonial Williamsburg breached the employment agreement which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. T. Neal Morris v. City of Danville, Virginia and Charles F. Church, and William H. Fuller, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Haigh v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  3. White v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  4. Barger v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
  5. Thompson v. American Motor Inns, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API