Legal Opinion

Zahralban v. Vicbar Construction Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtJames S. Brown, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike defendant’s counterclaim.

In this action by the purchaser to rescind a contract to buy and sell real estate, defendant builder has interposed an answer consisting of a general denial, an affirmative defense and a counterclaim. The affirmative defense reads that ‘ defendant was and is entitled to retain the sum of $1,650 as liquidated damages.” The counterclaim seeks $5,000 as damages at law for the very same breach of contract, for which defendant has retained the $1,650 paid on account of the purchase price.

*551Plaintiffs contend that defendant may not retain the money…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saunders v. AkersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API