Legal Opinion

Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. Stallings

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 29, 1958No. Civ. 9531PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSZEL C. THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This action by an insurer which had issued an automobile liability policy and certified it to the Department of Motor Vehicles as proof of the named insured’s continuing financial responsibility, seeks a declaratory judgment with respect to the obligations of the company to the named insured (Stallings) and to persons injured by his negligence in operating an automobile on July 14, 1956. The automobile which Stallings was operating at the time of the accident was not the automobile described in the policy, but the policy contained a “Newly Acquired Automobile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  2. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co. v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Birch v. Harbor Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Horace Mann Mutual Casualty Company v. BellDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  5. Jamison v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Erie Insurance Exchange v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. FalcianiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  5. Central National Insurance v. LeMars Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API