Legal Opinion
Mary Mathis v. Joseph F. Lockwood
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 2005No. 04-0516Published
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
════════════
No. 04-0516
════════════
Mary Mathis, Petitioner,
v.
Joseph F. Lockwood, Respondent
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
On Petition for Review from the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
2Per curiam
Mary Mathis, appearing pro se, appeals the trial court’s refusal to set aside a post-answer default judgment against her. The court of appeals affirmed, holding Mathis failed to overcome a presumption that she received notice of the trial setting. 132 S.W.3d 629,…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.