Legal Opinion

Barry Smith v. Paul J. Renzi Masonry

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 24, 2016No. N13C-03-252 FWWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

lN T§H§.`.~ SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF DELAWARE BARRY and CO.$§MHA SMI§§:‘J§, Plaintiffs, C.A. No. N13C-03-252 FWW PAUL J. RENZI MASONRY, d/b/a RENZI MASONRY and DEWSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ]NC., a Delaware Corporation ) ) ) ) ) ) v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: February 11, 2016 Decided: March 24, 2016 Upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Recover Costs GRANTED, in part, DENIED, in part. 001> ; 'ON AND GR‘HER Timothy A. Dillon, Esquire, McCann & Wall, LLC, 300 Delaware Ave., Suite 805, Wilmington, Delaware 9801, Attorney for Plaintiffs. Kevin J. Connors, Esquire, Marshall Dehnehey Wamer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Delaware Water & Air Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  2. State v. 0.0673 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  3. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. State Highway Department v. Lots Nos. 133, 134 and 135, Block 1, of Concord Heights, Situate in the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API