Grissom v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Doyle, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Jerry Grissom appeals his conviction of three counts of possessing a controlled substance (methamphetamine, alprazolam, and hydrocodone) and contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on the State’s improper comments about his pre- and post-arrest silence. Because the Supreme Court of Georgia has held that such comments violate a criminal defendant’s right to remain silent, and because the evidence of Grissom’s guilt was not overwhelming, we reverse.
The trial transcript shows that, during a narcotics investigation, police…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Chapel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Lockwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Romer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Mayberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010