Legal Opinion

Grissom v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 2009No. A09A1503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doyle, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Jerry Grissom appeals his conviction of three counts of possessing a controlled substance (methamphetamine, alprazolam, and hydrocodone) and contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on the State’s improper comments about his pre- and post-arrest silence. Because the Supreme Court of Georgia has held that such comments violate a criminal defendant’s right to remain silent, and because the evidence of Grissom’s guilt was not overwhelming, we reverse.

The trial transcript shows that, during a narcotics investigation, police…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Chapel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Lockwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  5. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Romer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Mayberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API