Espy v. State

The first insistence of error is based upon the rulings of the court in permitting the state’s witnesses to testify relative to the finding of the still, etc., in the smokehouse and on his premises without first showing that the officers making the search had a search warrant authorizing them to do so,. In the case of Mary Banks v. State (Ala. App.) 93 South. 293, 1 this question has been expressly decided adversely to the contention of the appellant. There was no error in these rulings.

The remaining questions presented relate solely to the rulings of the court upon the testimony, and to a…