Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 11, 2008No. 1-07-0483PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia
The plaintiff in this case, Graham Thompson, filed a petition for administrative review, seeking review of an annuity determination by the Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago (Retirement Board). Thompson alleges the Retirement Board erred by denying him benefits pursuant to section 5 — 129.1(a) of the Illinois Pension Code (Pension Code) (40 ILCS 5/5— 129.1(a) (West 2006)) and said denial resulted in Thompson’s benefits being diminished and impaired. The trial court denied Thompson’s petition for review, finding the Retirement Board did not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. RETIREMENT BD. OF POLICEMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Sklodowski v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Summers v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annunity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Board of Trustees of the City of Harvey Firefighters' Pension Fund v. City of HarveyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018