Legal Opinion

Haftel v. Appleton

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.

In view of the letter of counsel for plaintiff, dated Jánuary 15, 1964, the memorandum of January 13, 1964 is recalled. In lieu thereof, the court substitutes the following: !

*293The motion to consolidate this action with that pending in this court entitled Benjamin Meiselman and Rachel Meiselman v. Oliver D. Appleton, et al., and to enjoin any further actions for similar relief is granted, there being no opposition thereto. Pursuant to the request of the plaintiffs in both actions, Sidney B. Silverman, Esq., is designated as general counsel. The notice of examination before trial, dated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haftel v. AppletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Fernandez v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API