Legal Opinion

James Columbus Shaw v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 26, 1968No. 19153PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a conviction under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, for knowingly transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce.

The defendant urges three basic grounds for reversal: (1) ineffective assistance of appointed counsel, (2) denial of a personal right to select certain jurors, and (3) erroneous admission of his oral statement to an F.B.I. agent.

Defendant makes a vague allegation that although his appointed trial counsel was competent and skilled in the law, there existed a lack of “rapport” or “communication” between them which precluded effective representation.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. United States v. Benjamin IndiviglioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gallego v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. James Slawek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Corley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fairley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API