James Columbus Shaw v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a conviction under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, for knowingly transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce.
The defendant urges three basic grounds for reversal: (1) ineffective assistance of appointed counsel, (2) denial of a personal right to select certain jurors, and (3) erroneous admission of his oral statement to an F.B.I. agent.
Defendant makes a vague allegation that although his appointed trial counsel was competent and skilled in the law, there existed a lack of “rapport” or “communication” between them which precluded effective representation.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Benjamin IndiviglioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gallego v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- James Slawek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Corley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Fairley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.