Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Myers v. Myers

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 30, 2018No. 2160391Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, Presiding Judge

I dissent to that part of the main opinion reversing the judgment insofar as it orders Carl David Myers ("the husband") to pay the minor child's private-school tuition. As to that issue, I agree with Judge Moore's special writing.

I also dissent to that part of the main opinion that reverses the trial court's award of periodic alimony and remands the cause for a determination of " 'what, if any, amount of alimony might be warranted based upon the wife's expenses and the husband's income.' " 260 So.3d at 67, (quoting Sosebee v. Sosebee, 896 So.2d 557, 562 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004) ). The evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stone v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Scott v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Holmes v. HolmesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Groenendyke v. GroenendykeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Knight v. KnightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API