Sigmond v. Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium

The court properly quashed the subpoenas served by respondent on nonparty Bright Horizons because the parties did not stipulate to conduct discovery of Bright Horizons (see CPLR 3102 [b], [c]; compare Textron, Inc. v Unisys Corp., 138 Misc 2d 124, 126 [Sup Ct, NY County 1987]; Matter of ACE Am. Ins. Co., 6 Misc 3d 1005[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51732[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2004]).

We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Sweeny, Acosta, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.