Legal Opinion

Lurie v. Mammone

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

The plaintiffs in this action are husband and wife. The husband’s cause of action is for damages resulting from the alleged negligence of defendants. The wife’s cause of action is based on the fact that she ‘ ‘ has been deprived of the services of her said husband and of his society, companionship and consortium.” This motion is to dismiss the wife’s cause of action for insufficiency.

It is generally stated that an action of this type may not be maintained by the wife. (3 Restatement, Torts, § 695; 41" C. J. S., Husband and Wife, | 404; Note, 5 A. L. R. 1049,1050.) Decisions to this effect…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Oppenheim v. . KridelNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Goldman v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Maloy v. FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Garrett v. Reno Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Mo. Pac. Trans. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API