Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Meta v. Cinello

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1970No. Appeal, No. 86PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant sought visitation rights with a child who was living with its mother, appellant’s former wife, and *95for whom he had provided support since 1966. The mother objected to such visitation on the ground that the child, although born during her marriage to appellant, was actually the son of her second husband, with whom she was then living. The court ordered the parties to submit to a blood test to determine paternity under the Uniform Act on Blood Tests to Determine Paternity, Act of July 13, 1961, P. L. 587, 28 P.S. §307.1 et seq. See in this regard, President Judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lotz v. LotzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hall v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. COM. Ex Rel. LOTZ v. LotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawrence E. Hodge v. Ernestine HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sorace v. SoraceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Meta v. CinelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Strapple v. StrappleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Drum v. DrumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API