McKinney v. Hopwood
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Holcomb, J. In the argument reference was made to the following -cases: Eckman v. Scott, 34 Neb., 817; Bowen v. Foss, 28 Neb., 373; State Savings Bank of St. Joseph v. Soott, 10 Neb., 86; Webb v. Hoselton, 4 Neb., 308; Davis v. First Nat. Bank of Cheyenne, 5 Neb., 245; Gregory v. Hartley, 6 Neb., 356; Ch'ant v. Cropsey, 8 Neb., 205.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Plaintiffs commenced this action in the district court of Buffalo county to recover the amount alleged in the petition filed to be due them on a promissory note executed and delivered to them by the defendants. E. L. Hopwood, of defendants, answered and admitted the execution and de*872livery of the note to plaintiffs, and alleged further that she so executed it as surety for her husband, and that personally she did not receive any benefit from signing it, nor was her separate property benefited thereby; that the note was made for the amount of a judgment in favor of plaintiffs against her…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Grand Island Banking Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Burns v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Svetkovic v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- Carpenter v. BennettNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Union State Bank v. McKelvieNebraska Supreme Court · 1912