Legal Opinion

Mason v. Gohmann

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1986No. 49A02-8610-CV-370PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Judge.

L

ISSUE

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court's determination Stephen Goldsmith is a registered voter and thus qualified as a candidate for the office of Proge-cuting Attorney for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit is contrary to law. Mason unsue cessfully challenged Goldsmith's registration in a declaratory judgment action on the ground Stephen Goldsmith is not duly registered under his proper name. We affirm.

IIL

LAW

A

Standard of Review

The trial court entered its special findings and conclusions 1 pursuant to request and as provided in Indiana Rule of Trial Procedure…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Brown v. GrzeskowiakIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sherk v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Symmonds v. BarnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roake v. ChristensenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Hollars v. RandallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. COBBLESTONE II HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. BairdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API