Mason v. Gohmann
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
L
ISSUE
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court's determination Stephen Goldsmith is a registered voter and thus qualified as a candidate for the office of Proge-cuting Attorney for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit is contrary to law. Mason unsue cessfully challenged Goldsmith's registration in a declaratory judgment action on the ground Stephen Goldsmith is not duly registered under his proper name. We affirm.
IIL
LAW
A
Standard of Review
The trial court entered its special findings and conclusions 1 pursuant to request and as provided in Indiana Rule of Trial Procedure…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brown v. GrzeskowiakIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Sherk v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State ex rel. Symmonds v. BarnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roake v. ChristensenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hollars v. RandallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- COBBLESTONE II HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. BairdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989