Legal Opinion
Baum v. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 25, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The appellant excepts and assigns as error the refusal of the trial judge to admit certain evidence which would tend to show that the plaintiff requested the Agent of the defendant to issue the policy of insurance involved herein, on the engine in. question in the ferry boat known as the “Dare.”
Conceding but not deciding that the exclusion of this testimony was erroneous, we do not think it is material to a decision on this appeal.
If it be conceded that the policy covers the engine in question, the defendant denies liability on the ground that the policy does not cover the type of accident…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newtown Creek Towing Co. v. . Aetna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Cline v. Western Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Burnham v. China Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Carroll Towing Co. v. Ætna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harding v. American Universal InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961