Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reid
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1935No. 7372PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This suit under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Tex. art. 8306 et seq.) has been three times tried to a jury on substantially the same evidence. The first jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The District Judge set the verdict aside. The second jury, directed by the judge on the ground of insufficient evidence, to do so, returned a verdict for the defendant. We found the evidence sufficient, reversed the judgment, and remanded the cause for another trial. Reid v. Maryland Casualty Co. (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 10. The third jury found for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Snyder Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Reid v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Frederick Allen Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.