Legal Opinion

ALEJANDRO v. KIJAKAZI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 2024No. 2:21-cv-04076Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE ALBERTO ALEJANDRO, : : Plaintiff, : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : MARTIN O’MALLEY1 : No. 21-cv-04076-RAL Commissioner of Social Security : : Defendant : RICHARD A. LLORET April 18, 2024 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The decision held that Plaintiff Jose Alejandro was not disabled under the Social Security Act. Mr. Alejandro raises three issues for my review, under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). He contends that (1) the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) did not…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API