Legal Opinion
Sedivy v. Superior Home Builders, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 27, 1951No. 10298_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Chief Judge.
Two complaints were filed, each ' by a number of plaintiffs as purchasers from the defendants of family dwelling units built under Priorities Regulation 33 (11 F.R. 4085), in which a mandatory injunction was sought, requiring defendants to make restitution to each of the plaintiffs for sums allegedly paid in excess of the approved maximum sales price. Defendants moved to dismiss each of the complaints for failure to state a cause of action. Such motions having raised the same questions as to each complaint, the causes were consolidated. After hearing, the court by its order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Keele v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. FortierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- United States v. DuvarneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- United States v. FortierDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1950
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adams v. AlbanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- A. W. Hartwig and Jeff Tingle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Doernhoefer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Oruch v. Lipton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1953