Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Bellizzi
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. O’Brien, J.
These are motions to dismiss each complaint, under CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 1, 2, 8) and section 14 of the Public Health Law.
Each complaint alleges that defendants Bellizzi, Ortenzi and Curran are employees of the State of New York, defendant Bellizzi being Director of the Bureau of Narcotic Control, and defendants Ortenzi and Curran being investigators of said bureau into the traffic and sale of narcotic drugs; that plaintiff Bremer was a partner in an advertising firm; that plaintiff Wolfe was an employee thereof; that defendants engaged in a conspiracy to entrap plaintiff to sell to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Kaplan v. City of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Eldridge v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Graham v. ScriptureNew York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by9 opinions
- Salwen Paper Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Arce v. Sybron Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc. v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Clark v. CannizzaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Gold v. New York State Business Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.