Legal Opinion

Munzesheimer v. Wickham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1889No. 2851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Cass. Tried below before Hon. John L. Sheppard The opinion states the! case.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.

Appellant having been appointed administrator of the estate of W. J.' Wickham was removed on application of appellee, who was the widow of the intestate, and she appointed in his place.

Appellant gave notice of appeal to the District Court, and to perfect his appeal executed a bond, which after the requisite recitals contained the following language: “Therefore we, Max Munzesheimer,'as principal, and-, as sureties, acknowledge ourselves to be held and firmly hound unto the county judge of Cass County, in the State of-Texas, conditioned that the said Max Munzesheimer,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. OliverTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. ShadidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Felton v. BirchfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API