Legal Opinion

Appeal of Seagrave

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1889No. 129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM THE DECREE OF THE ORPHANS’ COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 129 July Term 1888, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 206 July Term 1882, O. C. On January 30, 1888, tlie second account of the Pennsylvania Company for Insurance on Lives, etc., executor of the will of Dr. Scott Stewart, deceased, showing a balance composed of cash and securities of $252,180.21, was called for audit, when W. S. S. Gay, Anne H. Valentine, Elizabeth Warded, Mary N. Seagrave and a large number of…

Read the full summary

FROM THE DECREE OF THE ORPHANS’ COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 129 July Term 1888, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 206 July Term 1882, O. C. On January 30, 1888, tlie second account of the Pennsylvania Company for Insurance on Lives, etc., executor of the will of Dr. Scott Stewart, deceased, showing a balance composed of cash and securities of $252,180.21, was called for audit, when W. S. S. Gay, Anne H. Valentine, Elizabeth Warded, Mary N. Seagrave and a large number of others, appeared by counsel, and as the heirs at law of the decedent and as legatees and devisees under his will, claimed his…

1Per curiam

We need not add anything to the careful and elaborate opinion of the learned auditing judge of the court below. The decree is affirmed for the reasons given by him.

Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wanamaker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Bradway v. ShattuckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Curran Foundation CharterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. McIlvaine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Mears's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API