Legal Opinion

Rubenstein v. Rubenstein

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 30, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 N.J. Super. 486 (1952)

91 A.2d 446

ROSE RUBENSTEIN, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JOSEPH RUBENSTEIN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided September 30, 1952.

Messrs. Feder & Rinzler (Mr. Joseph A. Feder appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.

Mr. Carl F. Nitto, attorney for defendant.

HEGARTY, A.M.

Defendant's motion brings up for consideration his application for an order requiring the plaintiff to submit to physical examination by Dr. Joseph F. Zigarelli, of Paterson, New Jersey. The application is based upon Rule 3:35 and 3:35-1 which provides:

"Rule 3:35. PHYSICAL AND MENTAL…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Devito v. DevitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API