Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 22, 1978No. 417-74PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Kenneth R. Harkins, filed May 31, 1977, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties.

The case concerns 41 disputed charges for carriage of Government property by rail. As is usual, the Government paid the charges, but on determining they were excessive via General Accounting Office post-audit, recovered the amounts by deductions from sums otherwise due. Sixteen items have been settled, on which plaintiff is due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. W. G. Cornell Company of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. CO-OP. SHIPPERS v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Howe v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Manuel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API