Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1993No. Docket Nos. B065129, B075899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

Appellant/petitioner (hereafter petitioner) makes this novel claim: he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel in his first appeal (B044048) because appellate counsel pursued rather than abandoned that appeal.

We find petitioner has failed to prove his claim and accordingly deny the petition and affirm the judgment.

Procedural and Factual Background

Because the only issue is effective assistance of counsel in the first appeal, the facts may be stated simply. We adopt Justice Ashby’s summary: “About seven months before the murder, the victim, Kenneth Fulcher,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Cabrera v. CatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. People v. Morales CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API