Legal Opinion

People v. Germany

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 2005No. B179638PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.—

INTRODUCTION

In 1998, defendant and appellant Nathan Germany (defendant) pleaded nolo contendere to a single count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)) and admitted to a prior conviction within the meaning of Penal Code 1 sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d) (“Three Strikes” law). The trial court sentenced defendant to two years in state prison.

In 2003, after serving his prison term, defendant moved to vacate the judgment in his case pursuant to newly enacted section 1473.6, which allows…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Nolan v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People v. TotariCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. GoodrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. VillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. Levens CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API