Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County v. Kirk

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1905No. L.A. No. 1837PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. D. Fredericks, District Attorney, and Hartley Shaw, Chief Deputy, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate compelling the superintendent of public instruction of the state, in making his apportionment of the state school fund to the various counties, to include and consider as a part of the average daily attendance of the schools of plaintiff the attendance of children between the ages of four and five years, who have been regularly admitted to the kindergarten classes established by the educational authorities of certain cities of plaintiff county. It appears from the petition that defendant proposes to include the attendance on such classes of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stockton School District v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sinnott v. ColombetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wilson v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. La Rue v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Wall v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. Collins, New York County Courts1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API