Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Mayor of New York

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court—Daly, J.

The first question in this case is, whether the plaintiff could be examined as a witness in his own behalf in an action against the corporation of the city of New-York. By the 399th section, the examination of a party as a witness on his own behalf is conditional. It can be had *173where the adverse party or person in interest is living, unless the opposite party is the assignee, administrator, executor, or legal representative of a deceased person. It is objected that the defendants here are not, within the meaning of this section, a living party, but an artificial body,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & BaggNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  2. Wilson v. Mayor of New YorkCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Van Wormer v. Mayor of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Falls & Smith v. BelknapNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Parsons v. LindsaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Davenport v. RuckmanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1862
  3. Stiles v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API