Legal Opinion
De Garcia v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 2010No. 07-71182PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Analilia Arenas de Garcia and her husband, Gelasio Garcia (“the Garcias”), petition for review of a BIA decision denying their motion to reopen their removal proceedings. Some of the evidence that the Garcias submitted with their motion to reopen and with a subsequently filed “supplemental brief’ in support of their motion, was cumulative of evidence that they had submitted during their hearing, and some was not. We hold that, pursuant to Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2006), we have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to the extent that it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Miranda B. v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jose Lopez-Vasquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Youssif Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Ali v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Tadevosyan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Hornish Trust v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.