Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 2006No. 2D04-1965Published

1Per curiam

We affirm Virginia Armstrong’s conviction for trafficking in hydrocodone. See §§ 893.03(c); .135(l)(c)(l), (6), Fla. Stat. (2002). We strike the $150 cost imposed for “CFF” because the circuit court did not cite any statutory authority for this cost. See Cruz v. State, 830 So.2d 892 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2002). Armstrong preserved this issue by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The circuit court did not rule on her motion within sixty days, so it is deemed denied. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B).

Conviction affirmed, cost stricken.

NORTHCUTT, SALCINES, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cruz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API