Legal Opinion
People v. Endsley
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 2016No. E063931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SLOUGH, J.
One of the ways a defendant who has been found not guilty by reason of insanity and committed to the state hospital may be released from commitment is by applying for restoration of sanity under Penal Code section 1026.2. (People v. Tilbury (1991) 54 Cal.3d 56, 60 [284 Cal.Rptr. 288, 813 P.2d 1318] (Tilbury).) Release under section 1026.2 is a two-step process: conditional release to an outpatient treatment program for a trial period and, if successful, unconditional release into the community. (Tilbury, supra, at p. 60.) This case involves the first step.
In May 2015,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. TilburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. SoiuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Endsley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Bell CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. EndsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. Longstreet CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Smith CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020