United States v. Louisiana
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.
Considering the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Fordice1 vacating the Court of Appeals decision in Ayers v. Attain,2 this Court ordered the parties to appear and show cause on September 30,1992 why the Court should not reinstate its now vacated order granting summary judgment in favor of the United States and enter the Court’s proposed remedial order with respect thereto.3 On September 25, 1992 the Court continued and reset the hearing for Monday, November 2, 1992, pursuant to a “Joint Motion to Continue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. State of La.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Ali Abu Salim v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026