Legal Opinion

Montague v. Smedley

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1976No. 2639PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This appeal arises from a superior court order dismissing a petition for writ of ha-beas corpus and presents an issue of first impression in Alaska: whether a judicial determination of probable cause is a prerequisite to interstate extradition from Alaska. We hold that a judicial determination of probable cause is a necessary prerequisite to extradition and further conclude that probable cause was not established in this case either in the demanding state or in the papers which were submitted under the requirements of federal law to Alaska. We therefore hold that the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Innes v. TobinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Oliver Lee Kirkland and Elizabeth Smith v. Paul H. Preston and Luke MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Charles E. Smith v. State of Idaho and Paul W. Bright, Sheriff of Ada County, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Kostic v. SmedleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Grano v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rayburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. ConsalviMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Swarner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API