Legal Opinion
Hayes v. McGill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 30, 1921No. 10676PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Before McIvER, J., York. --. Action by W. G. Hayes against J. Mason McGill. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. cites: Express warranty : 35 Cyc. 372-4: Implied warranty: 105 S. C. 273. Express warranty excludes implied warranty: 35 Cyc. 392; 112 S. C. 422. cites: Express warrant excludes implied warranty: 112 S. C. 422.
1Opinion of the Court
June 30, 1921. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This statement appears in the record:
"This was an action brought by the respondent, W.G. Hayes, for the purpose of recovering the sum of $1,600 from the appellant, from whom respondent alleged he had purchased a certain truck, and that the appellant had guaranteed that the truck was sound and in good condition, and practically new; and that respondent, relying on the express warranty of the plaintiff, bought said truck, and afterwards discovered that it was worn out, and only good for old junk; and as there had been a complete failure…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Oliver Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Blackwell v. FaucettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- McFadden v. Anderson Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922