Legal Opinion

Harr v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 14, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court .by

Judge Kees —

Keversing.

The appellants, Cletius Harr and L. S.' Ensley, were jointly indicted and charged with a criminal conspiracy as defined by section 1241a-l of the Statutes. The accusatory part of the indictment reads:

“The Grand Jury of Lewis County, in the name and by the authority of' the Commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Cletius Harr and L; S: 'Ensley' of the crime "of unlawfully, willfully- and feloniously confederating and banding 'themselves together for the purpose of doing, a felonious, act.”

' Iir the descriptive part of the indictment, it- -is alleged that,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Eubank v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Deaton and Boggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Acree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Lowery v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Braswell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  4. Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Finley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API