Legal Opinion
Harr v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 14, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court .by
Judge Kees —
Keversing.
The appellants, Cletius Harr and L. S.' Ensley, were jointly indicted and charged with a criminal conspiracy as defined by section 1241a-l of the Statutes. The accusatory part of the indictment reads:
“The Grand Jury of Lewis County, in the name and by the authority of' the Commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Cletius Harr and L; S: 'Ensley' of the crime "of unlawfully, willfully- and feloniously confederating and banding 'themselves together for the purpose of doing, a felonious, act.”
' Iir the descriptive part of the indictment, it- -is alleged that,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Overstreet v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Eubank v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Deaton and Boggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Acree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Lowery v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Braswell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Finley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953