Legal Opinion · Dissent

George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Cbk, Ltd. And Cbk, Ltd., Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 20, 1996No. 94-1498, 94-1521Published

1DissentCowen, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent because, in my opinion, the decision of the majority is plainly contrary to Brooktree Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 977 F.2d 1555 (Fed.Cir.1992), and Modine Mfg. Co. v. Allen Group, Inc., 917 F.2d 538 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 918, 111 S.Ct. 2017, 114 L.Ed.2d 103 (1991). Modine is directly on point. At the trial level in that case, the jury found willful infringement. Modine Mfg. Co. v. Allen Group, 14 USPQ2d 1210, 1216, 1989 *1574WL 205782 (N.D.Cal.1989), aff'd 917 F.2d 538 (1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 918, 111 S.Ct. 2017, 114 L.Ed.2d 103 (1991). The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Modine Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The Allen Group, Inc., D/B/A the G & O Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Graco, Inc. v. Binks Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API